There are some operational considerations that we need to continue to iron out. The slide transitions are now a little more involved now. You will notice in the clip below that we chose to go with two different camera shots. Shot A will be our regular Sermon close-up. Shot B will be roughly knees up so that Marty's chin does not appear as though it is attached to the slide notes. Alright, perhaps that is an exaggeration... Compare Shot A with a lower third and shot B with a lower third. It is my opinion that Shot B with lower third makes a much less awkward presentation. I welcome your thoughts.
Shot A

Shot B
I can almost hear the question rattling around in your head right now..."Why not keep shot B throughout the whole sermon?" That's a good question and is the approach that we attempted at first. However, we found that while Marty was seated, that shot B was ... less than flattering. Add to that the fact that the IMAG Marty is now much smaller in shot B, and the visual decision was made.
Please take a look at this clip as well as reviewing larger chunks of the sermon at Vimeo (http://bit.ly/DkQN6). I'd like feedback on our use of lower thirds. Is the camera transition distracting? What other thoughts do you have?
1 comment:
From the viewpoint of the audience the bottom thirds are great, but the transitions in and out were a little rough (and subsequently slightly distracting). Of course I am probably more picky than most of our audience. Is there a way to fade to all blue on the PC side (leaves only live shot) and then do a clean break to live with no visible transition?
Post a Comment